"Twelve Angry Men", by Reginald Rose.

This semester I read the mash Twelve Angry manpower, by Reginald Rose. It is or so a jury trying to prick up with a verdict for a teenage male person child who is being accused of killing his father. In the play thither are 2 very important characters. These characters are jurywoman function iii and juror keep down eight. Number Three is very against talking about anything. He is positive(p) that the boy is guilty and doesnt care to listen to any new(prenominal) opinions. jurywoman cardinal is very opposite of number three. Number Eight will always listen to all opinions and wants to look everything over. He does not know yet if the boy is guilty or innocent. In this play a very important patch is made. This point is: justice isnt justice if it is dark. Many times in this play people added their own personal lives into what they felt happened on the night of the murder. They often looked at the boys background, and decided who he was by their experience s and personal feelings. People have a natural lifetime to favor one side of a case or another. Usually these feelings come from a personal experience or built in beds. Often times these feelings were challenged. One hap that a personal situation is effecting the case is done so by Juror Number Ten.

He is not embarrassed of being biased. He tells the other jurors, Ive lived amongem all my life. You cant conceptualize a word they say. The helping of this sentence that makes it so biased is when he uses the words I amongem , and they . These words show that he is putting personal situations into his relation , also they characterized the boy ! into a certain group from his background. though the man knows nothing about the defendant... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper